Strong majority support “stand your ground” in New Hampshire – 468 participants

Jul 25, 2017

Under castle doctrine laws, a resident may use deadly force without first attempting retreat if the resident is attacked in his or her home.  Under so-called "stand your ground" laws, a resident may use deadly force anywhere he or she has a right to be without first attempting retreat. Read more about this issue. On July 25, Citizens Count, NH’s Live Free or Die Alliance decided to put the issue to its Facebook members, posting the question, “Should New Hampshire require people to attempt retreat (when possible) before using deadly force outside the home?”

“Should New Hampshire require people to attempt retreat (when possible) before using deadly force outside the home?”

Results: Yes or No Respondents

Deadly Force Citizen Voices Chart

Participation: 468 participants gave 953 responses

A total of 96% of those participating gave a ‘yes or no’ response to the question. The remaining 4% of participants engaged in the discussion but did not give a ‘yes or no’ response. In total, 468 individuals from New Hampshire contributed a total of 953 responses or reactions to this question. (Click here for details on our methodology.)

What Participants Said:

No: A strong majority of ‘yes or no’ respondents, at 95%, were against requiring people to retreat before using deadly force outside the home. 

  • “If a law abiding citizen is in a dangerous situation, their location shouldn't impact their right to self-defense.”
  • “No one should be forced to retreat when threatened. That kind of law empowers criminals.”
  • “Any responsible gun owner knows the difference between a shoot or don't shoot situation and I think as it stands the law is pretty well written.”

Yes: A minority of ‘yes or no’ respondents, at 5%, believed that people should be required to retreat before using deadly force outside the home.   

  • “Yes.  I am a citizen not law enforcement.”
  • “To ‘retreat’ when it is safely possible can avoid a horrible, deadly mistake: depriving someone of life, liberty or property without due process… A civilized society should allow violence only as a truly last resort.”
  • “Deadly force should always be the last resort.”

Other: As noted above, 4% of those participating did not give a ‘yes or no’ response, instead addressing their comments to related questions and issues. These included discussing when deadly force is and is not justified:  

  • “Breaking and entering doesn't threaten your life, so it's not automatically self-defense.”
  •  “Feeling intimidated is not a legitimate justification for the use of deadly force, and would not be protected by Stand Your Ground laws.”
  • “If an armed intruder is running away and you don't stop him/her and he/she kills someone else how would you feel?”

*Editor selection of actual participant quotes. 

Add comment

Log in or register to post comments

Site-wide Search

Related Bill

Join CCNH-LFDA

Join our constantly growing community. Membership is free and supports our efforts to help NH citizens become informed and engaged. 

JOIN TODAY ▸

©2017 Live Free or Die Alliance | The Live Free or Die Alliance is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization.