Crime and Public Safety

Death Penalty: “balancing justice against compassion” is ridiculous.

2 posts / 0 new
Last post
Mark Stewart
Death Penalty: “balancing justice against compassion” is ridiculous.

Progressives juxtapose justice and compassion as opposites because they overlook victims’ families. The death penalty for a convicted murderer is both just AND compassionate. It’s a compassionate signal that our government shows to victims; it’s a sign that we attempt to right wrongs fairly.

To allow the murderer to live in tranquility is UNjust. On a one-to-one calculation, the equation is STARKLY in favor of execution: the murderer gets to live with his sins, while the victim is dead. Nobody has been able to satisfy me with an answer to this simple question: why does a murderer DESERVE to live?

On a Benthamite “greatest good” calculation, the scales of justice weight even more strongly in favor of execution. The murderer has not taken just one life. He has taken away a loved one from family members; he has taken away a co-worker, and he has taken away someone’s friend. On top of all that, he has exacerbated fears in every member of the community that they might be next.

The death penalty is compassionate. It’s compassionate to all society, the victims of one murderer’s greed. The death penalty forcefully states to society that we DO want perfection, and that every good member of society is worth fighting for.

To those who say “it’s not our place to take a life; only God should do that”, we must reply that the best word from God that we have is the Bible, wherein it says (5 times) that man shall administer the death penalty for murder. “Whosoever sheds blood, by man shall his blood be shed”.

Compassion is the best argument FOR the death penalty. That the death penalty, if invoked swiftly and regularly MAY deter, is a pragmatic plus. Those who doubt the pragmatism should consider the following experiment: in states that allow the death penalty, let a convicted murderer whose crime was committed on an even numbered day be condemned to a 30 year prison sentence, but let a murderer whose crime was committed on an odd number day know that

Cathie P.
- Hampton
What about society?

Hi Mark,

I've always been interested in the death penalty debate and remember listening to a discussion about it from a sociological standpoint. One person argued against the death penalty because thay said, "How can you kill someone who is a product of their society? Shouldn't society be at fault to some degree?" Meaning, aren't adults a product of how they were raised --their childhood, their parents, their schools, their community? People should certainly be held accountable for their actions, but to what extent and where is the line between the individual and the influence of the environment they were brought up in? From a societal perspective, do you think anything should or could or needs to be done within our communities, to try to prevent murder from occurring in the first place?

Site-wide Search

Active Topics

By WILLIAM FORTUNE     0 Replies
By drowe     0 Replies
By dsaad     0 Replies
By Jeff Curtis     1 Replies
By VRW     0 Replies

Join CCNH-LFDA

Join our constantly growing community. Membership is free and supports our efforts to help NH citizens become informed and engaged. 

JOIN TODAY ▸

©2015 Live Free or Die Alliance | The Live Free or Die Alliance is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization.