Prohibits the state entity from providing any accounting service or payroll deduction on behalf of a private corporation or organization. This would apply to deductions for United Way, supplemental insurances, and union dues/agency fees.
Public Employee Contract Revisions
- The Legislature has considered several ways to shift the balance of power in collective bargaining for public employees.
- In 2011, the Legislature passed a bill eliminating “evergreen clauses” that extend the terms of expired contracts during negotiations.
- Other options considered include giving the Legislature veto power over contracts, and making public workers “at will” employees if contracts expire.
- Pro: Giving the state more power in contract negotiations will ensure the public has a greater voice.
- Con: Giving the state more power could slow down contract negotiations or result in an unfair deal for workers.
Some lawmakers think that public employee unions have too much power over the government when it comes time for contract negotiations. Over the years the Legislature has considered several ways to shift the balance of power in collective bargaining for public employees.
Adding legislative oversight
Some lawmakers support a measure that would give the Legislature the power to veto any collective bargaining agreement entered into by the state.
Supporters argue that legislative oversight would give the public a voice in contract negotiations.
Opponents of legislative oversight argue that it will simply slow down already lengthy and complex contract negotiations. Gov. Hassan's 2013 public employee contract negotiations took almost a year.
An "evergreen clause" in public employee contracts allows provisions of an expired contract to continue while contracts are being negotiated. Those provisions can include wage step increases, cost of living allowances, etc. In 2011 the state Legislature passed SB1, which eliminated the clause from public contracts.
Critics of SB1 said the state should not be involved in negotiations between towns and their public employee unions.
Those who favored the bill said it would help eliminate expenses that cities and towns were otherwise forced to accept without approval.
In 2011 the Legislature also looked at a proposal that would make public workers "at-will" employees if their contracts expire without any kind of renewal.
The measure was added as an amendment to the state budget by the House Finance Committee. The amendment stated that after a contract expires, public workers "shall become at-will employees whose salaries, benefits, and terms and conditions of employment shall be at the discretion of the employer."
The sponsor of the measure, Rep. Neal Kurk (R-Weare), said the legislation would motivate public employee unions to settle contracts quickly and affordably, or else give their employers the power to set wages and benefits.
Opponents of the measure argued that it gave too much power to employers, and might even create an incentive for employers to reject contract renewals.
The Senate Finance Committee ultimately removed the "at-will" proposal from the budget. Committee Chairman Chuck Morse said that policy committees can decide on union issues, while the budget panel will stick to budget items.
The large unfunded liability in the New Hampshire Retirement System may affect future benefits for public employees. Click here to see the LFDA issue page on Retirement Benefits.
New Hampshire has also debated becoming a right-to-work state, which would affect public employee unions. Click here to see the LFDA issue page on right-to-work.
Requires a public employer who does not appoint a veteran or disabled veteran to a position to provide information on other public employment positions for which the veteran or disabled veteran may be qualified.
Establishes a hiring preference for laid off classified state employees.
Adds the Legislature to the definition of public employer.
Provides that project labor agreements shall not be included in government construction contracts.
Establishes a commission to study if different public employee collective bargaining procedures should be used for different categories of public employees.
Requires the state to negotiate with each bargaining unit separately, rather than with a committee with representatives from multiple bargaining units.
Gives the legislature power to review collective bargaining agreements entered into by the state.
Requires legislative approval of any collective bargaining agreement entered into by the state.
Eliminates "evergreen clauses" in public contracts.
Should NH revise the laws governing collective bargaining to shift more power to the state?
After a months-long dispute, public employee unions reached an agreement with Gov. Sununu over contracts. The contracts included small raises for state employees and law enforcement, in exchange for changes to sick and bonus leave benefits. State corrections officers will see a bigger increase, at 9.1%, a move spurred by difficulties the Department of Corrections has faced in finding and hiring staff.
CONTACT ELECTED OFFICIALS »
Here in NH, your opinion counts. We make it easy to find and reach out to your elected officials about the issues that matter most to you. Click to search and contact your elected officials!